Highly prospective exploration company

Resource projects cover more than 1,713 km2 in three provinces at various stages, including the following: hematite magnetite iron formations, titaniferous magnetite & hematite, nickel/copper/PGM, chromite, Volcanogenic Massive and gold.

Free
Message: Re: You don't speak for all
7
Nov 01, 2012 08:48PM

Personality disorder much or just hypocrisy, Sudbury? I believe the message below is from the same person, correct?? (rhetorical question, don't bother answering). Clearly you must be truly bored in your life to try and incite and annoy what the overwhelming majority of people here have long concluded about Peter's inepitude when it comes to being an effective CEO and why the proxy contest was embraced. In fact, you could point the finger at Peter who could have stepped down as CEO well before the fact! Perhaps worked a deal with Granger and settle an amicable agreement? No, I won't let you absolve Peter of the responsibility for the position this company is in at the moment.

So it would be great if you took your own advice and moved on, that is, if you actually want to put your money where your mouth is based on ... what did you say, "respect everyone's opinion". Your're not vested in Fancamp's interest clearly, you're just here to pick a fight with people given your timing and theme of posts. Hopefully you'll post something constructive like why was LaFleur hastily chosen as the CEO? Are you happy with that? Is LaFleur just another Geo type with no realy CEO experience? Does that concern you? That's what methinks and i'd rather have a conversation about real issues that than reading your baseless, irresponsible, and inflammatory comments.

Thanks...and good luck

From_Sudubry in response to Re: Current Management is Savvy and Sincere by Geofan
posted on Oct 21, 12 10:02PM Use the IP Check tool [?]

Well, it's been a good Peter vs Granger debate.

Some certainly favor Peter and will not change their mind, while others favor Granger and will not change their minds. At stake were the undecided's.

I think by now all points have come to light by both sides and most have placed their votes.

Although at times...some comments/statements got personal and unwarranted...in the end I think we could agree to disagree. We are all shareholders who are trying to make some money on our investments.

Some of us are looking short term and others are looking more long term.

Some of us have met/talk to/perhaps had business dealings with Peter and some have not.

Some have been here a long time...others not so long.

Our level of investment is different as well.

Our past experiences with our other investments come into play as well.

After everything that's been said and done, I'd just like to thank everyone who have contibuted to this debate and felt moved to give their input. I respect everyone's opinion and it's evident people here are compassionate....on both sides.

Good luck to all

2
Nov 01, 2012 10:28PM
6
Nov 02, 2012 12:15AM
6
Nov 02, 2012 09:04AM
5
Nov 02, 2012 10:01AM
6
Nov 02, 2012 10:08AM
8
Nov 02, 2012 10:42AM
7
Nov 02, 2012 11:48AM
6
Nov 02, 2012 12:01PM
5
Nov 02, 2012 01:07PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply