> By "designing a deeper test in one of the existing wellbores" I wonder if they are talking about the Mako-7 ? You know, the historic well that was plugged and left for dead for how many years now??

Just for clarity, you must mean Makó-6.

Hey John, yes of course, i accidentally confused the deepest well with the deepest formation. Obviously M-7 is in fact deeper than M-6 but falls outside of the synrift zone. Synrift or not it would be interesting to see what kind of flows would come from the B.C. (we know the pressure and temperature are off the charts)...i suggested M-7 for re-rentry only because it's fracking "virgin" just sitting there all these years awaiting its chance. Then again, the geology and data gained so far suggests that big flows may not be achieved even from deeper formations without drilling horizontal extensions into sweet spots.

BTW, the graphic you attached (as many times as i've seen it) is still among my very favourites.

Cheers,

LP