Welcome to the Equinox Gold Hub On AGORACOM

Free
Message: Re: Dissent vs. Voting No.
11
Mar 23, 2011 08:57PM
1
Mar 23, 2011 09:02PM
2
Mar 23, 2011 09:44PM

Mar 23, 2011 10:59PM
2
Mar 23, 2011 11:08PM
7
Mar 23, 2011 11:18PM
1
Mar 23, 2011 11:40PM
16
Mar 23, 2011 11:55PM
5
Mar 24, 2011 12:02AM
1
Mar 24, 2011 12:13AM
3
Mar 24, 2011 12:20AM
3
Mar 24, 2011 12:24AM
3
Mar 24, 2011 12:29AM
2
Mar 24, 2011 12:32AM
1
Mar 24, 2011 12:34AM
6
Mar 24, 2011 12:45AM
2
Mar 24, 2011 12:57AM
6
Mar 24, 2011 12:59AM
4
Mar 24, 2011 01:08AM
2
Mar 24, 2011 01:08AM
3
Mar 24, 2011 01:10AM
4
Mar 24, 2011 01:10AM
7
Mar 24, 2011 01:13AM
3
Mar 24, 2011 01:23AM
4
Mar 24, 2011 01:41AM

Cynical,

I'm not sure I'm the best person to answer your question... my expertise is not in that area... but here is my take on transparency:

I've seen multiple publicly traded companies use those corporate structures before, so they are not exactly novel. Also, regardless of the holding company structure, those subsidiaries' financial results are ultimately consolidated into the parent company, WTG's financial statements... so that would be a tough argument to make to say the transparency is lacking.

3
Mar 24, 2011 02:18AM
2
Mar 24, 2011 02:27AM
1
Mar 24, 2011 02:36AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply