Hoov is certainly the natural choice. However, I think Positive Carry said it best by suggesting a committee or sorts. I think this 'committee' will evolve in the near future, and I think Hoov even alluded to something along those lines by saying he was going to be talking to 'Fair for All' in person in the near future.

The one thing Hoov brings to the table is integrity, and that is something that I think can only be earned over time.

A well balanced committee could do wonders for this group of stakeholders. You're spot on, on this committee needing money. MONEY would be required to do this properly, and you would need enough to show that you cannot be bled dry.

Money can always be refunded, and with some of the guys I think would be involved - I'm 100% sure any dollar not used would be returned.

Just spitballin here, but I'd think you'd want to have at least $300k to secure a good lawyer and not fizzle out in the first 30 days. If we get a shareholder list (first step) I think it's best to get aggressive and collect at least 1 cent per share. I think the stronger you show, the more return you would get on that investment and I think would be the best percentage investment you could make this year.

I'm limping in here, but I'm excited by the challenge and think this is a unique experience. However if we are talking percentages, its NOT a time to be cheap. It's a time be bold and aggressive - kind of exactly how you are being treated by your management.

And if any committee isn't able to collect money, they're handcuffed.

And in Canada, emailing money is about as challenging as registering into Agoracom so it should be painless to collect.

Just sharing some thoughts...