Glenfidish,

Some of the questions can be better formulated after we see the offer (especially those dealing with specific conflicts of interests). But here are a couple of relevant questions:

(1) If CMM is committed to the highest standards of corporate governance (as its website claims) why is it that the Company failed to appoint a second Canadian director to its board?

(2) CMM also claims that the majority of its directors shall be independent of management; so how is it that the independent directors are actually in a minority?

(3) How can a Board ,dominated by Scola/Finskiy appointees, offer an unbiased opinion of fairness in case of takeover or merger offer form WTG?