Re: Why ignore the existing?
in response to
by
posted on
Apr 30, 2014 01:21PM
Crystallex International Corporation is a Canadian-based gold company with a successful record of developing and operating gold mines in Venezuela and elsewhere in South America
has freshfields dealt with this situation where the owners of the company had to sell it off to afford the arbitration. Why is this not part of the damages case as it was Venezuela's breach that caused the sell off. I know it sounds like collecting twice but it is damages that flowed directly fom their breach why should shareholder be caught short.