Re: VD water rights
posted on
Apr 22, 2015 12:42PM
CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)
I didnt say someone claimed I said that, but this is all you wanted to talk about and had nothing to do with what I was saying. I was not talking about any of these aspects and I was expressing that I was confused as to why this is all you talked about.
Cool if you think that is a good anology, but it's apples to oranges. Also as I said I don't agree with what you think about SC in this respect, but this isn't the discussion.
Now Deeppocket actually understood what I was saying, and he is probably very right in what he said, but regardless unless we know one of the local miners have large interest why shouldn't we look into the water rights? We are limiting ourselves if we don't and it's not like our staff was mega busy all winter, they could have worked on something.
We never ever planned on mining at SC, but why did we secure the port? Hmm, sounds like a familiar scenario.
Now that's an anology.