Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: New buy out / back in pool
1
Mar 17, 2013 12:56PM
2
Mar 17, 2013 01:07PM
6
Mar 17, 2013 01:49PM
6
Mar 17, 2013 02:33PM
24
Mar 17, 2013 03:19PM
1
Mar 17, 2013 09:09PM
5
Mar 17, 2013 10:14PM
2
Mar 18, 2013 01:20AM

Mar 18, 2013 08:48AM
3
Mar 18, 2013 08:51AM
10
Mar 18, 2013 09:18AM
7
Mar 18, 2013 12:09PM
3
Mar 18, 2013 12:13PM
1
Mar 18, 2013 12:14PM
1
Mar 18, 2013 01:55PM
30
Mar 18, 2013 02:52PM
3
Mar 18, 2013 03:15PM
5
Mar 18, 2013 03:20PM
7
Mar 18, 2013 03:49PM
10
Mar 18, 2013 04:08PM
2
Mar 18, 2013 04:11PM
4
Mar 18, 2013 04:26PM
10
Mar 18, 2013 09:57PM
16
Mar 19, 2013 12:45AM
6
T2T
Mar 19, 2013 02:04AM
10
Mar 19, 2013 05:33AM
16
Mar 19, 2013 06:49AM

I'm afraid what RabidTiger and Chops have to say rings quite true to me. For all the pluses with Schaft Creek there are those to be found elsewhere for a lot cheaper given the current state of the market.

For an example...Bell Copper has a small producing mine that could be had for a 200% premium to today's SP and still only cost Teck less than $4M. Bell's operation is very close to CCY's La Verde project also quite cheap in today's market. Teck could add that to the pile for a 200% premium amounting to only $30M and use nearby Bell Copper's infrastructure to further improve La Verde. Two good projects for less than $50M. Double them again to a 400% premium to recent trading and they are still only about $100M.

These are just examples of some current ready to go projects that could likely be had extremely cheap and there are more out there. The whole ecosystem of projects is such that the kind of premium we've talked ourselves into for CUU probably won't happen. Why would Teck spend Billions, then spend Billions to build when it could spend Millions?

6
Mar 19, 2013 09:36AM
2
Mar 19, 2013 09:43AM
1
Mar 19, 2013 09:47AM
2
Mar 19, 2013 09:59AM
13
Mar 19, 2013 10:08AM
3
Mar 19, 2013 10:11AM
4
Mar 19, 2013 10:16AM
1
Mar 19, 2013 10:21AM
8
Mar 19, 2013 10:31AM
4
Mar 19, 2013 10:40AM
4
Mar 19, 2013 10:43AM
8
Mar 19, 2013 10:50AM
14
Mar 19, 2013 10:52AM
7
Mar 19, 2013 10:55AM

Mar 19, 2013 11:02AM
6
Mar 19, 2013 11:43AM
5
Mar 19, 2013 11:45AM
4
Mar 19, 2013 11:53AM
3
Mar 19, 2013 11:55AM
11
Mar 19, 2013 12:11PM
1
Mar 19, 2013 12:13PM
3
Mar 19, 2013 12:17PM
5
Mar 19, 2013 12:19PM
4
Mar 19, 2013 12:22PM
3
Mar 19, 2013 12:47PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply