Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: New buy out / back in pool
1
Mar 17, 2013 12:56PM
2
Mar 17, 2013 01:07PM
6
Mar 17, 2013 01:49PM
6
Mar 17, 2013 02:33PM
24
Mar 17, 2013 03:19PM
1
Mar 17, 2013 09:09PM
5
Mar 17, 2013 10:14PM
2
Mar 18, 2013 01:20AM

Mar 18, 2013 08:48AM
3
Mar 18, 2013 08:51AM
10
Mar 18, 2013 09:18AM
7
Mar 18, 2013 12:09PM
3
Mar 18, 2013 12:13PM
1
Mar 18, 2013 12:14PM
1
Mar 18, 2013 01:55PM
30
Mar 18, 2013 02:52PM
3
Mar 18, 2013 03:15PM
5
Mar 18, 2013 03:20PM
7
Mar 18, 2013 03:49PM
10
Mar 18, 2013 04:08PM
2
Mar 18, 2013 04:11PM
4
Mar 18, 2013 04:26PM

I'll preface by saying I don't think your valuation is as unrealistic as $5+ given what we know about the current NPV's...however, 8% seems high after an EA and further infill drilling. You're also giving $0 for the rest of the lands...what's included in the FS and the rest of the lands are separate. Ya, it's just potential and it's not worth billions but it's not worth 0 either.

I'm also curious about the process you suggest. Do you really think that a few infill drills will make them go "let's manage our risk with 20%" to "we should buy the whole thing!"

You suggest they don't get anything if they spend $300M and need to spend $340M...but if the mine is going to be built, there's no reason to stop spending. If it isn't going to be built, then it doesn't matter if they own 0% or 20% or 75%...because it's not worth anything if you can't actually mine it. I just don't understand if a mine will be built, why they wouldn't want more for a miniscule amount. I understand not buying us out right away - but not your logic on the %.

16
Mar 19, 2013 12:45AM
6
T2T
Mar 19, 2013 02:04AM
10
Mar 19, 2013 05:33AM
16
Mar 19, 2013 06:49AM
16
Mar 19, 2013 09:29AM
6
Mar 19, 2013 09:36AM
2
Mar 19, 2013 09:43AM
1
Mar 19, 2013 09:47AM
2
Mar 19, 2013 09:59AM
13
Mar 19, 2013 10:08AM
3
Mar 19, 2013 10:11AM
4
Mar 19, 2013 10:16AM
1
Mar 19, 2013 10:21AM
8
Mar 19, 2013 10:31AM
4
Mar 19, 2013 10:40AM
4
Mar 19, 2013 10:43AM
8
Mar 19, 2013 10:50AM
14
Mar 19, 2013 10:52AM
7
Mar 19, 2013 10:55AM

Mar 19, 2013 11:02AM
6
Mar 19, 2013 11:43AM
5
Mar 19, 2013 11:45AM
4
Mar 19, 2013 11:53AM
3
Mar 19, 2013 11:55AM
11
Mar 19, 2013 12:11PM
1
Mar 19, 2013 12:13PM
3
Mar 19, 2013 12:17PM
5
Mar 19, 2013 12:19PM
4
Mar 19, 2013 12:22PM
3
Mar 19, 2013 12:47PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply