Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: Not Good-WG
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Not Good
9
Russ Reid
Feb 07, 2013 10:33AM
Re: Not Good
9
BurningRoF
Feb 07, 2013 10:34AM
Re: Not Good - Russ
18
Pat66
Feb 07, 2013 10:46AM
Re: Not Good - Russ
3
sydneyb
Feb 07, 2013 10:56AM
Re: Not Good - Russ
10
bostrin
Feb 07, 2013 11:01AM
Re: Not Good
22
Metacomet
Feb 07, 2013 11:02AM
Re: Not Good -- Russ Reid
5
Richy7
Feb 07, 2013 11:11AM
Re: Not Good
4
Pat66
Feb 07, 2013 11:14AM
Re: Not Good - Russ
4
Investorish
Feb 07, 2013 11:18AM
Re: Not Good
32
cbew
Feb 07, 2013 11:23AM
Re: Not Good - Investorish
4
Pat66
Feb 07, 2013 11:27AM
Re: Not Good - Investorish

Investorish
Feb 07, 2013 11:33AM
Re: Not Good
6
BurningRoF
Feb 07, 2013 11:36AM
Re: Not Good
8
Metacomet
Feb 07, 2013 11:39AM
Re: Not Good
3
mahzman2
Feb 07, 2013 11:43AM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
13
Pat66
Feb 07, 2013 11:43AM
Re: Not Good
17
cbew
Feb 07, 2013 11:53AM
Icon president Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
15
Chappy726
Feb 07, 2013 12:10PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
4
Foxyroller
Feb 07, 2013 12:25PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
3
Pat66
Feb 07, 2013 12:26PM
Icon president Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
8
Chappy726
Feb 07, 2013 12:43PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
7
Skibum2
Feb 07, 2013 02:50PM
Re: Not Good - cbew
10
hoghead
Feb 07, 2013 03:08PM
Re: Not Good - cbew
16
cbew
Feb 07, 2013 03:21PM
Re: Not Good - well imo
1
sydneyb
Feb 07, 2013 03:30PM
Re: SP Premiums
2
deeppocket83
Feb 07, 2013 03:32PM
Re: SP Premiums
7
hoghead
Feb 07, 2013 03:55PM
Icon president Re: SP Premiums
14
Chappy726
Feb 07, 2013 04:11PM
Re: SP Premiums
12
Metacomet
Feb 07, 2013 04:13PM
Re: SP Premiums
12
cbew
Feb 07, 2013 04:26PM
Re: SP Premiums
9
calvin123456789
Feb 07, 2013 04:27PM
Re: SP Premiums
7
hoghead
Feb 07, 2013 04:32PM
Re: SP Premiums

orangepeel
Feb 07, 2013 05:13PM
Re: SP Premiums
2
neofight
Feb 07, 2013 05:36PM
Re: SP Premiums
11
calvin123456789
Feb 07, 2013 06:36PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
4
Brad129a
Feb 07, 2013 07:02PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
18
cbew
Feb 07, 2013 07:48PM
Icon president Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
31
Prospekt
Feb 07, 2013 08:06PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
26
mcsweep
Feb 07, 2013 08:10PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
3
cbew
Feb 07, 2013 08:27PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
16
Metacomet
Feb 07, 2013 08:39PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.

Liddy77
Feb 07, 2013 08:47PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
8
Metacomet
Feb 07, 2013 09:01PM
Icon president Re: Not Good
40
Chappy726
Feb 07, 2013 09:10PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
11
Metacomet
Feb 07, 2013 09:14PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
2
Pat66
Feb 07, 2013 09:16PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
2
Nav2006
Feb 07, 2013 09:22PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
5
treborjim
Feb 07, 2013 10:32PM
Re: Not Good at First Glance - But Look at what is recommended!
7
RabidTiger
Feb 07, 2013 11:49PM
Icon president Re: Not Good
20
webgogs
Feb 07, 2013 11:50PM
Re: Not Good

simc1
Feb 08, 2013 12:01AM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
29
CanadaGrant
Feb 08, 2013 12:40AM
Icon president Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
3
stockfriend
Feb 08, 2013 09:38AM
Icon president Re: Not Good
17
Chappy726
Feb 08, 2013 09:46AM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
14
treborjim
Feb 08, 2013 10:00AM
Re: Not Good - WG

Pat66
Feb 08, 2013 10:07AM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al. Trebor

Pat66
Feb 08, 2013 10:17AM

You have indicated a possible hydro system a while ago. If confirmed, the root could be gigantic and the whole area should be interesting as you said.

Wonder whether Teck's acquired land around SC is in the ratio 75:25, compared what CF has acquired.

KP

Icon president Re: Not Good-WG
8
webgogs
Feb 08, 2013 01:26PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
7
Brad129a
Feb 08, 2013 09:45PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
5
cuushareholder
Feb 08, 2013 09:49PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
14
cbew
Feb 08, 2013 10:20PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
18
RabidTiger
Feb 08, 2013 10:30PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
16
hoghead
Feb 08, 2013 10:35PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
5
cbew
Feb 08, 2013 10:57PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
8
hoghead
Feb 08, 2013 11:14PM
Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
17
venturevestor
Feb 08, 2013 11:36PM
Icon president Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
2
stockfriend
Feb 08, 2013 11:47PM
Right by the xxxxs
3
orangepeel
Feb 09, 2013 09:48AM
Icon president Re: Right by the xxxxs
12
stockfriend
Feb 09, 2013 10:51AM
Icon president Re: Not Good - Investorish and al.
10
webgogs
Feb 09, 2013 12:14PM
Re: Right by the xxxxs
11
Orcinus
Feb 09, 2013 01:58PM
Re: Right by the xxxxs
5
calvin123456789
Feb 09, 2013 02:09PM
Re: Right by the xxxxs
12
Metacomet
Feb 09, 2013 03:27PM
Re: Right by the xxxxs
12
cbew
Feb 09, 2013 03:38PM
Icon president Re: Right by the xxxxs
10
chunkytoast
Feb 09, 2013 04:01PM
Re: Right by the xxxxs
7
RabidTiger
Feb 09, 2013 04:11PM
Re: Right by the xxxxs
6
Metacomet
Feb 09, 2013 04:58PM
Re: Right by the xxxxs
9
RabidTiger
Feb 09, 2013 05:07PM
Icon president Re: Right by the xxxxs
4
chunkytoast
Feb 09, 2013 05:57PM
Icon president Re: Right by the xxxxs
5
stockfriend
Feb 09, 2013 06:48PM
Re: Right by the xxxxs
12
RabidTiger
Feb 09, 2013 07:32PM
Icon president Re: Right by the xxxxs
1
stockfriend
Feb 09, 2013 07:47PM
Re: Right by the xxxxs
9
mahzman2
Feb 09, 2013 07:51PM
Re: Not Good-WG
1
kupper
Feb 10, 2013 01:55PM
Icon president Re: Not Good-WG
9
Chappy726
Feb 10, 2013 04:09PM
Re: Not Good-WG
2
kupper
Feb 10, 2013 04:31PM
Re: Not Good-WG
2
orangepeel
Feb 10, 2013 05:06PM
Reply New Message
Back To Forum List View
Share
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply