Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: SP Premiums
9
Feb 07, 2013 10:33AM
9
Feb 07, 2013 10:34AM
18
Feb 07, 2013 10:46AM
3
Feb 07, 2013 10:56AM
10
Feb 07, 2013 11:01AM
22
Feb 07, 2013 11:02AM
5
Feb 07, 2013 11:11AM
4
Feb 07, 2013 11:14AM
4
Feb 07, 2013 11:18AM
32
Feb 07, 2013 11:23AM
4
Feb 07, 2013 11:27AM
6
Feb 07, 2013 11:36AM
8
Feb 07, 2013 11:39AM
3
Feb 07, 2013 11:43AM
13
Feb 07, 2013 11:43AM
17
Feb 07, 2013 11:53AM
3
Feb 07, 2013 12:26PM
10
Feb 07, 2013 03:08PM
16
Feb 07, 2013 03:21PM
1
Feb 07, 2013 03:30PM
2
Feb 07, 2013 03:32PM
7
Feb 07, 2013 03:55PM
14
Feb 07, 2013 04:11PM
12
Feb 07, 2013 04:13PM

If Teck buys us out, it will back in for 75%, leaving us with 23% (the part we will be selling them). If we got $1.50/share, 1.50 x 400 million shares = $600 million for our 23%. If we extrapolate the 100% value from the 23% for 600 million we get the property value of about 2.5 billion. Isn't that one of the more optomistic valuations in the FS?

Here`s the problem with using straight percentages in calculating our value. Teck has only one option to choose from. Teck will most likely not chose one option ( say the 75%) and then try to buy out our remaining interest at a straight 25% value. If Teck decided to do that then I suspect we would put up our remaining interest to the highest bidder and we would get a far higher premium than a straight 25% value of the entire property. Does Teck want to take that chance and enter into a bidding war with other Majors? Do they also want to lose the Liard shares that are straight income royalties without the expenses? This same scenario applies equally with any of the other options of 40% and 20%.

I suspect, and imo, that neither of these options would be desirable for Teck due to the fact they may have to partner up with someone they do not desire or be put under a time constraint to build and operate a mine and at the same time carry the interests of an undesirable partner.

Imo, the only option that makes most financial sense for Teck is a complete buyout of our interests (100%). The question is at what premium then would they do this at? A straight 25% of the value of SC? Not on your life. 100% value - not likely either as backing in would be more desirable despite the possible consequences. So imo I suspect anywhere b/n 25% to 60% value of SC would be possible. More likely, I think it could be closer to 50%. If Teck paid 50% of what SC was worth then they could easily sell a 50% interest to someone else and come out without paying anything. What a deal that would be to Teck. I think if they arranged a deal like this their shareholders would be ecstatic and wouldn`t mind someone else paying a multiple of our current sp. They would have 50% of the deposit at zero cost.

This is one possible scenario and could be the reason for our long delays if Teck is indeed looking for a partner to take us out. This is my speculation only.

9
Feb 07, 2013 04:27PM
7
Feb 07, 2013 04:32PM

Feb 07, 2013 05:13PM
2
Feb 07, 2013 05:36PM
11
Feb 07, 2013 06:36PM
18
Feb 07, 2013 07:48PM
3
Feb 07, 2013 08:27PM
40
Feb 07, 2013 09:10PM
2
Feb 07, 2013 09:16PM
20
Feb 07, 2013 11:50PM

Feb 08, 2013 12:01AM
17
Feb 08, 2013 09:46AM

Feb 08, 2013 10:07AM

Feb 08, 2013 10:45AM
8
Feb 08, 2013 01:26PM
14
Feb 08, 2013 10:20PM
5
Feb 08, 2013 10:57PM
3
Feb 09, 2013 09:48AM
12
Feb 09, 2013 10:51AM
11
Feb 09, 2013 01:58PM
5
Feb 09, 2013 02:09PM
12
Feb 09, 2013 03:27PM
12
Feb 09, 2013 03:38PM
10
Feb 09, 2013 04:01PM
7
Feb 09, 2013 04:11PM
6
Feb 09, 2013 04:58PM
9
Feb 09, 2013 05:07PM
4
Feb 09, 2013 05:57PM
5
Feb 09, 2013 06:48PM
12
Feb 09, 2013 07:32PM
1
Feb 09, 2013 07:47PM
9
Feb 09, 2013 07:51PM
1
Feb 10, 2013 01:55PM
9
Feb 10, 2013 04:09PM
2
Feb 10, 2013 04:31PM
2
Feb 10, 2013 05:06PM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply