Re: Moose Mountain...again
in response to
by
posted on
Sep 22, 2012 10:00AM
CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)
Not a study for CUU
They will continue their focus on the BFS for Schaft
Teck could have contracted a study by Moose Mountain, since we know Jim Gray was working the Schaft study anyway, to run a parallel exercise probing a district development including Galore and Schaft
This would incorporate portions of the CUU study with additional input for Galore, both areas that Gray has worked before
Doesn't seem that far fetched
We pretty much are unanimous in our belief that Teck will take Copper Fox
They are in control of Galore
Don't ya think they might to consider an exercise exactly like the on that was "slipped" on the Moose Mountain web site
...and lighten up people
Far as I 'm concerned this thread is for a lot of folks who are talking about Copper Fox
This speculation is absolutely on topic...and whether or not it pans out that this is what is happening, I don't see the problem with suggesting the possibility
One of the advantage of this thread is the possibility of being exposed to ideas that may have escaped our individual notice
If this is too much of a distraction try alcohol