Welcome To the Copper Fox Metals Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

CUU own 25% Schaft Creek: proven/probable min. reserves/940.8m tonnes = 0.27% copper, 0.19 g/t gold, 0.018% moly and 1.72 g/t silver containing: 5.6b lbs copper, 5.8m ounces gold, 363.5m lbs moly and 51.7m ounces silver; (Recoverable CuEq 0.46%)

Free
Message: Re: Future
3
MES
Mar 30, 2012 09:57PM
13
Mar 30, 2012 11:31PM
1
Mar 31, 2012 12:44AM

It will cost Teck more money if they back in 75% vs buying CUU out before Feasibility. They are also adding a lot more risk to themselves during the process. Everything is explained below.


What`s wrong with you Vette? I never mentioned buying 75% vs 100% and everything you explained below is totally unnecessary.


Teck can't sell what they don't own....CUU owns 100%.


Don't make me feel stupid, please spend some time and think about what you read or write. Even kids know that you can't sell something that you don't own. Don't keep repeating things that we all know. I am very positive about Teck buying 75 + 25 % but since we don't know if Teck will buy all other properties from CUU I think there will be no drilling and no PP for now.

I don't want to discuss the other things you wrote because it doesn't make sense. Whenever they buy us, before or after FS, there are no obligations or risks for them and of course they CAN sell it if they decided to do so.


Your problem is that you see only one way in which this could end, and forcing all of us to think the same way by repeating and adding some other facts and risks that are not even part of the current discussion.

I could be wrong about drilling and PP, we will find out soon. I try to make my posts as short as possible (I never read long posts) but don't take advantage of it. I agree with most of the things you write here but remember how many times you were wrong too.

4
Mar 31, 2012 12:36PM

MES
Mar 31, 2012 12:56PM
3
Mar 31, 2012 01:08PM

MES
Mar 31, 2012 01:46PM
5
Mar 31, 2012 04:19PM
3
MES
Mar 31, 2012 10:58PM
17
Apr 01, 2012 08:36AM
16
Apr 01, 2012 08:42AM
9
Apr 01, 2012 09:58AM
4
Apr 01, 2012 10:55AM
21
Apr 01, 2012 11:11AM
6
Apr 01, 2012 11:12AM
8
Apr 01, 2012 11:18AM
15
Apr 01, 2012 11:37AM
11
Apr 01, 2012 12:03PM
14
Apr 01, 2012 12:08PM
9
Apr 01, 2012 12:14PM
21
Apr 01, 2012 12:23PM
10
Apr 01, 2012 12:30PM
15
Apr 01, 2012 12:50PM
16
Apr 01, 2012 01:01PM
2
Apr 02, 2012 12:14AM
3
Apr 02, 2012 09:16AM
2
Apr 02, 2012 09:17AM
1
Apr 02, 2012 09:19AM
1
Apr 02, 2012 09:21AM
1
Apr 02, 2012 09:24AM
Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply