Agoracom: Small Cap Investment - Aurelian Resources Inc. - Vote of confidance...

Aru%20revolt%20 %20header

Aurelian Resources Was Stolen By Kinross and Management But Will Not Be Forgotten

The company whose shareholders were better than its management

Free

Reply New Message

Back To Forum List View

monmick

Rank: Vice President [?]

Points: 1305 [?]

Votes: 59 Score: 3.2 [?]

Your Vote:

Please Log In to Vote

Did you know? You can earn activity points by filling your profile with information about yourself (what city you live in, your favorite team, blogs etc.)

Vote of confidance...

posted on Sep 12, 2008 06:23AM

Kinross Gold Corporation (K)	As of September 11th, 2008
Filing Date	Transaction Date	Insider Name	Ownership Type	Securities	Nature of transaction	# or value acquired or disposed of	Unit Price
Sep 11/08	Sep 08/08	Riley, Shelley M.	Direct Ownership	Common Shares	10 - Disposition in the public market	-1,421	$15.140
Sep 11/08	Sep 08/08	Riley, Shelley M.	Direct Ownership	Common Shares	57 - Exercise of rights	2,872	$15.140
Sep 11/08	Sep 08/08	Riley, Shelley M.	Direct Ownership	Restricted Shares	57 - Exercise of rights	-2,872	$15.140
Sep 11/08	Aug 07/08	Crossland, James	Direct Ownership	Common Shares	10 - Disposition in the public market	-2,457	$17.560
Sep 11/08	Aug 07/08	Crossland, James	Direct Ownership	Common Shares	57 - Exercise of rights	5,000	$17.560
Sep 11/08	Aug 07/08	Crossland, James	Direct Ownership	Restricted Shares	57 - Exercise of rights	-5,000	$17.560

Loading...

Loading...

1

Sep 12, 2008 06:28AM

1

Sep 12, 2008 06:38AM

Re: stock---Kinross doesn't get 90% ?

Sep 12, 2008 08:36AM

Re: stock---Kinross doesn't get 90% ?

3

Sep 12, 2008 10:16AM

Re: stock---Kinross doesn't get 90% ?

Sep 12, 2008 10:19AM

Re: stock---Kinross doesn't get 90% ?

1

Sep 12, 2008 10:38AM

Re: stock---Kinross doesn't get 90% ?

2

Sep 12, 2008 11:05AM

Re: stock---Kinross doesn't get 90% ?

1

Sep 12, 2008 11:17AM

Re: stock---Kinross doesn't get 90% ?

Sep 12, 2008 11:17AM

Another extension would not be in our interest,

1

Sep 12, 2008 11:22AM

Re: Another extension would not be in our interest,

Sep 12, 2008 11:24AM

Re: stock---Kinross doesn't get 90% ?

1

Sep 12, 2008 11:33AM

Re: stock---Kinross doesn't get 90% ?

4

Sep 12, 2008 11:34AM

Re: Another extension would not be in our interest,

2

Sep 12, 2008 11:35AM

Re: Another extension would not be in our interest,

1

Sep 12, 2008 11:35AM

Re: stock---Kinross doesn't get 90% ?..aitakahashi

2

Sep 12, 2008 11:40AM

Re: Another extension would not be in our interest,

Sep 12, 2008 11:42AM

Re: Another extension would not be in our interest,

3

Sep 12, 2008 11:52AM

Re: Another extension would not be in our interest,

4

Sep 12, 2008 11:58AM

Re: Another extension would not be in our interest,

4

Sep 12, 2008 12:10PM

Re: Another extension would not be in our interest,

4

Sep 12, 2008 12:13PM

Re: Another extension would not be in our interest,

1

Sep 12, 2008 12:18PM

Re: Another extension would not be in our interest,

3

Sep 12, 2008 12:30PM

Re: Another extension would not be in our interest,

1

Sep 12, 2008 12:31PM

Re: Another extension would not be in our interest,..

Sep 12, 2008 12:37PM

Re: Another extension would not be in our interest,..tummasz

2

Sep 12, 2008 12:57PM

Re: Another extension would not be in our interest,

2

Sep 12, 2008 01:07PM

Re: Another extension would not be in our interest,..tummasz

2

Sep 12, 2008 02:34PM

Reply New Message

Back To Forum List View

Share

Share

Share

Please to post a reply