the fact that Goodman is wealthy and, and consequently, would not risk his good reputation, experience elsewhere shows

that this is not always the fact indeed. Just remember how

Munk found Suhartos backdoor when everyone was

going thru the front door

Haven' Goodman & Co already soiled their reputation esp

in the ARU case where, evidently, by providing a VERBAL

fairness when it was obvous there was a collusion between

the ARU Board jerks and Kinross at the expense of the

little guy who normally doesnt count except putting

money into Dynamic funds

if they want to be genuine leaders, we want to see

a conduct accordingly - not waht we have seen in this stinking ARU/Kinross mess

Ciao

Tina