Welcome To The Quarterhill Inc. HUB On AGORACOM

Intellectual Licenses for Electronics & Communications

Free
Message: Foss Patents weighs in on this litigation (already): from cabbiejbj

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Canadian licensing firm WiLAN requests U.S. sales ban of BlackBerry's latest,
LTE-capable devices

BlackBerry (previously known as Research In Motion) believes some injunctions
based on standard-essential patents can be "procompetitive" (see 1, 2, 3). It
promotes the -- sorry to say so -- wacko idea to curb patent litigation between
major operating companies in this industry by allowing anyone who holds SEPs to
seek sales bans over those in order to deter assertions of non-SEPs. The latest
one became publicly available today: an amicus curiae brief basically supporting
Google against Judge Posner (it's not worth further analysis here because it's
consistent, in substance and quality, with BlackBerry's/Research In Motion's
prior submissions, but I've uploaded it to Scribd for those who care to read it
regardless). Maybe that company will realize just how bad an idea it is to
promote SEP-based hold-up if the latest generation of its own devices is
deprived of its 4G (LTE) capability by an injunction another Canadian firm is
seeking in the United States: WiLAN today announced its filing of a patent
infringement case against BlackBerry in the Southern District of Florida over a
patent related to the 4G (LTE) standard.

The patent-in-suit is U.S. Patent No. 8,274,991 on a "protocol for allocating
upstream slots over a link in a point-to-multipoint communication system". The
exemplary accused product in this case is the BlackBerry Z10 as used on the AT&T
network. Paragraph 17 of the complaint contains a standards-based infringement
allegation:


"The use of Defendants' LTE Products for uplink transmission over an LTE network
results in performing a method for obtaining uplink transmission bandwidth as
claimed in the '991 Patent. Upon information and belief, the protocol for making
uplink bandwidth requests is a built-in capability that is automatically
executed when a user uses Defendants' LTE Products to communicate over an LTE
network."

The induced-infringement theory basically says that by encouraging end users to
use LTE, BlackBerry instructs them to infringe the patent-in-suit.

In one of its prayers for relief, WiLAN is seeking "{b]oth preliminary and
permanent injunctions against Defendants and their officers, agents, employees,
attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them,
prohibiting infringement of the '991 Patent".

If you'd like to be updated on the smartphone patent disputes and other
intellectual property matters I cover, please subscribe to my RSS feed (in the
right-hand column) and/or follow me on Twitter @FOSSpatents and Google+.

http://www.fosspatents.com/2013/05/canadian-licensing-firm-wilan-requests.html

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply