Hi Kent,

Thanks for your post.

I remember reading in the 10K that his salary was based upon an agreement of $150,000 per year. The 10K for the fiscal year ended June 2005 showed a salary for the year of almost $137,000.

I believe that the point that a number of posters are making is that this is still a fairly substantial salary when compared to shareholder losses.

Thanks again for your post.

Jeff