Kathy,

Before I respond to your last posts, I do want to say that I am sorry for you regarding the problems you are dealing with in your personal life. Those things can`t be discounted. However, those things are completely irrelevant with respect to Nanopierce. If posting on this board affects your health or family, I think we would all respect your opinion to take care of that part of your life. If you have nothing to gain by supporting Nanopierce, it makes no sense to be here if it causes any kind of problem.

Mary is almost as big an enigma to me as are you. There has been way too much drama involved with this investment. I will be the first to admit that I don`t know what is real, and what is made up. I really don`t know if Mary`s involvement had any more to do with the current state of affairs than the failure of Nanopierce to execute their plan. There are times I actually wonder if she`s not part of this whole exercise.

If someone has extra money to invest in a risky venture, then I suppose Nanopierce might be attractive to them. But for those of us who have been misled over the course of their investment, and who have lost a great deal of money in the process, we would be considered downright stupid to trust the same people who present no evidence to support their general claims. It`s not that we have closed minds, it`s that we learn from our mistakes. The fact that I still own Nanopierce stock that I purchased at over $6 a share gives me every reason to question individuals here who are telling us to put our trust in the same people.

Give all of us just one legitimate reason for believing that there is anything to this new venture. I still wouldn`t consider investing until I see hard numbers; but, at least I would be a little more comfortable with my current holdings.

Jeff