Hi Doc,

It is pretty clear that those who support the company don`t want to deal in facts.

I am still waiting on answers to some very specific questions which should be easily answered. Kathy is quick to defend the company when it can be done with opinions. I`d like to see her present facts that support the claims of the PRs. If she really cared about the truth, she would influence management to provide that information for investor review. Why wouldn`t she demand that information herself? Especially since she professes not to have any material ties to the company.

I feel pretty enlightened now... unfortunately, it took the loss of a lot of money in the process before I realized what was happening.

What happened between Intercell, Brunetti, and the County of Los Alamos still makes the hair on the back of my neck stand up.

It makes absolutely no sense for anyone who has any history with this company to support the actions of its management.

I agree with you... the goal of management appears to be the leveraging of what`s left of the company to continue making payroll.

All my personal opinion.

Jeff