Hi Kent,

I hope your optimism is contageous.

I am still skeptical. Besides the dilution of long-term shareholder investments, there`s the dilution that will be created by the administrative costs of all the new people involved and how it will affect whatever profits flow to Nanopierce.

And, I think that`s another major puzzle piece. We (as shareholders) know nothing of the agreements made by the principals. We don`t know what money will be put back into the company, we don`t know the salaries of the principals, and we don`t know all of the consultants who may be involved. All of this will be a drain on the profit.

We also know nothing of the claimed purchase orders and related interests.

The fact is, we don`t know much.

Until there is an actual SEC document presented which shows how much money was made, and what the costs of this new business are, I see no reason to view this as anything different than another Brunetti deal.

The only people that are really benefiting (from our circle of acquaintances) are Paul and Kristi. Their salaries are still being paid. I guess I could become more optimistic if I was being paid to do so, too.

I hope I`m wrong. But, I wouldn`t park even $100 in this company right now, even if it was burning a hole in my pocket. If I had no history with Nanopierce, I might be tempted. There`s too much of the same ole - same ole for me.

Jeff