PMB,

I respect you for your honesty. It is clear to me that you are objective in your assessment of the company at any point in time, good or bad.

I don't doubt Vyta's managers are working hard to make things happen. But, to draw an analogy based upon a line from the movie Christmas Vacation, someone may be working hard at what they do... but so do washing machines. Working hard isn't the key... results are what matters. I believe that Paul understands the legal aspect of business; however, business is really about selling a product or a service for a profit. To date, none of the companies have come close to making a profit.... not Intercell (before and after Brunetti), not Nanopierce, and not Vyta. In 10+ years, working hard has yielded nothing but loss and frustration for shareholders (and a salary for management).

Many longs have lost a huge amount of investment money. Many of us chose to believe what we were told by management, at least for the first few years. There has been no real success, and certainly no reward for shareholders. Why is it that unhappy longs are criticized for suggesting that further investment should only be considered once revenue-generating business has been secured? Who has the money (or the tolerance) to continue investing in any company that continually fails to make good on it's forecasts?

Keep up your posting... I enjoy reading your opinions.

Jeff