To understand what I am purveying here, You may wish to revisit or examine the content of the two links provided below.

https://agoracom.com/ir/steliasmines/forums/discussion/topics/695154-police-evidence-of-networks-of-criminals-judges-lawyers-and-court-registry-staff-accepting-bribes-and-payoffs-to-fix-the-outcome-of-court-cases/messages/2164471#message 

https://agoracom.com/ir/steliasmines/forums/discussion/topics/695154-police-evidence-of-networks-of-criminals-judges-lawyers-and-court-registry-staff-accepting-bribes-and-payoffs-to-fix-the-outcome-of-court-cases/messages/2164512#message

 If You can appreciate the power in 200-1000 SLI investors writing their own "affidavits" which includes names of all the authorities they have been in contact with, and quotes from these authorities, as well as email communications, and attaching these affidavits to a huge court case, You may then see, that those authorities named in Your affidavits/testimonies, would be subpoenaed to court. This is the way a fair and unbiased judicial system is supposed to work....

 However, because of the extensive criminal infiltration and criminal foundation of the present judicial system, any court of law practicing in Canada, excluding Peoples Courts, would present You with a burdened bias decision. Before even going to court with the SLI case, an unbiased un infiltrated judicial system would have to be set up. At present, because of testimony and documentation like the affidavit by the RCMP investigator provided above, there is NO valid judicial system nor court that You may give Your consent to, to experience an unbiased legal decision.  I will also add, that because of this and more, that any legal decision by a judge in at least the last several years, is invalid and not in force. You simply cannot have a criminal system unbiasedly judging others, it is totally ridiculous and does not have to be accepted by any Human.

 So, what You may do, is take forth a case, empowered by many affidavits that subpoena the authorities to court, it must be an open to the public case to assure full transparency, allowing voice and video recordings into the court room. It is presently one of two ways to get a fully unbiased decision on this incontestable case.

 To empower Your case, even more, join with the other investor groups and individual investors that have experienced the same suppressive behavior from authorities. Get as many of those to also write affidavits and have those filed within the courts. You may then approach a contingent of a million investors under one case that CANNOT be ignored or swept under the rug. This case would further expose the corruption and the ones behind and involved with it, allowing You to receive, rightful justice.

 Although many scoff the Natural Law, some intentionally, some ignorant to this higher Law of the planet, the Kanata referrals were an introduction to the higher tool that may be required with this case. Where a judicial system is defunct, and this is very easily proven by incontestable documentation of the present Canadian system, a Natural Law court would have to be accepted even by the Canadian government, to have the full capacity as the ruling judgment system. I should remind You here, that in actual existing courts under the Canadian judicial system, that there are provisions made to accommodate matters from a Natural Law perspective when requested.