Re: Well worth a Review
in response to
by
posted on
May 03, 2017 02:55PM
Keep in mind, the opinions on this site are for the most part speculation and are not necessarily the opinions of the company WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Spouses are not defined as related parties in any legislation. But they are related parties, non-arms length. Just like common law spouses, and boyfriend/girlfriend relationships.
And Rushkowsky was more than a boyfriend. He had influence within the company. The transaction was subject to the approval of the board, and required disclosure.
Your employer, if a securities regulator, is getting poor value. And playing with fire by allowing you to post on a stock blog about a matter that is/was under investigation.