Re: Peruvian properties update!!
in response to
by
posted on
Dec 28, 2016 08:34PM
Keep in mind, the opinions on this site are for the most part speculation and are not necessarily the opinions of the company WITHOUT PREJUDICE
What is iniially required is opening a communications channel with John and working on unity. A small representive group of shareholders should be set up quickly and proceed to open the channel and explore opportunities that have both John's and shareholders interests in mind. Strength is in unity, not in separation. Unity leads to building, separation leads to destruction, plain and simple.
The more trust, the lesser the associated costs.
If a mutual agreement was reached between John and SLI shareholders, it then could be determined what interest each original SLI share represented, with a value being directly put on John and Marcial's interests as well, so that both parties are satisfied. As it goes now, most of you know that it is intentional to relieve you of your SLI interest, so what do you have to lose?
Lori has no say in this other than securing the shareholders interest through any facilitation because of the ~ 91% shareholder vote, and many other things. Lori is not owner of the SLI company, nor Minera Santa Elisa, she is merely a representative that was unjustly voted in office with the indirect assistance of Justice Steves, that allowed her to stay.