An excellent and very important point Randy. Also, I would like to welcome you to the forum and say it is great to see a new poster that is a loyal shareholder. To the rest here, it should be a great example of how many shareholders are still very interested in what happens, but have not revealed to the others that they in fact do follow this forum yet. There is no denying that there are many shareholders and non shareholders that follow this board and if one is gauging interest by the amount of "thumbs up" that you may see on the posts, this is a false indicator of the actual interest. I remind everyone that there is also a large component of viewers from various institutions and other professions that just observe this forum as well, lawyers and so called authorities, two name only two. As for opposing lawyers viewing this forum, some, if not all of those lawyers antics, have been foiled. The lawyers tactics were foiled in such a way that the realization that their tactics could legally backfire on them, kept them at bay from forcing a losing battle upon us. This is truth and fact, not a pompous nor egotistical statement by me.

Now to the subject of your post Randy and perhaps a deeper analogy of what you are actually saying.

So, in the begining, the most logical and professional thing for any CEO or company to do in a situation with such a profound ANOMALY (ies), WAS/IS, to put a drill into the heart of the anomaly. As an example, an experienced hunter upon shooting a deer, would never aim for the hoof, they shoot for the heart area, it is common sense.

Lori,s story about drilling the anomaly was never clear and even inconsistent, as to why she acted in this manner, blatantly supports some type of deception. Very simple, either they drilled it or not. In conjunction with her beating around the bush, is the IMPORTANT absence of the azimuths, which would publicly reveal if the holes angled into the anomalies or away from them. For this crucial INFORMATION TO BE WITHHELD FROM SHAREHOLDERS AND THE PUBLIC, does NOT ALLOW for anyone to be able to discern if the anomalies were actually drilled or not. This ONE FACT of not producing the azimuths to us, and MORE IMPORTANTLY, THE NON ENFORCEMENT BY THE BCSC to assure the 43-101 regulations are adherred to, shows the blatant collusion of the BCSC in this conspiracy/coverup. Why else would an authority such as the BCSC not enforce the law on someone, one answer is, that they must be part of it and are protecting their own interests as well. The BCSC owns interests are as simple as being an arm of government that is also easily influenced by BARRICK GOLD. It is no coincidence that the head investigative geologist of the BCSC is a Barrick contact. It is further not a coincidence that several Canadian Politicians have before and since, become prominent figures in the operations of Barrick Gold. It is no coincidence that Barrick Gold dropped a small concession adjoining the Tesoro in the early days, and allowed for Lori to pick it up and annex it with our other Tesoro properties.

The anomalies ARE BRIGHTLY CHARGED and the only thing that could give such a geophysical response, is HIGH MINERALIZATION. If Lori even tries to say that she did drill the anomaly and that the poor drill results were the findings, this is a bare face lie and NONE of the HISTORIC RESULTS, BOTH geophysical and geological supports NOTHING being there, plain and simple. THERE IS NO WAY THEY CAN WRIGGLE OUT OF THIS AND THE TRUTH.

It is merely a matter of time, before many more truths are revealed, which only clinches the shareholders position even more, of ALL THE PARTIES AT FAULT WITH THIS CONSPIRACY. The amount of damages alone from these collusive aspects will enjoy the investors with much value, let alone THE TRUE VALUE OF EACH ONE OF THEIR STOCK.

To simply put everything, you do not drill a highly charged target such as the anomalies, and have nothing in them. Remember, one proclamation of the Quantec Geophysics, "it is a mine finder".

Rick Jewers