Re: A Hint at More TO Come
in response to
by
posted on
Feb 18, 2016 07:41PM
Keep in mind, the opinions on this site are for the most part speculation and are not necessarily the opinions of the company WITHOUT PREJUDICE
This excerpt certainly identifies fully with what SLI shareholders have been experiencing.
"This story contains elements fit for the most riveting spy novel. Certain things are known, in the public domain, and can be discussed and analyzed. Knowledge of certain other items will only become known in the fullness of time and after the final differences in interpretation, charges, countercharges and new charges have been settled."
The ridulous and childish personal attack on me by the puppet masters, inspired by their greed, is/will also be fully revealed to the public. The full and incredulous theme involving the lowest puppets on message boards to the top of the pyramid, will be accepted by belief.
The only reason for such an insidious attack upon me with accompanying death threats, is that the Tesoro is HUGE. NOTHING else explains the attention given me by the greed.
Quantec even lied, or at least Kevin Killin, in a testimony/affidavit I observed. Kevin said Quantec gave no drill plan to SLI, while in fact, the drill plan is public knowledge and is clearly presented in the 43-101 technical report. Kevin, as you seen a few days ago, is apparently ONE of the geophysicists that STEVE/SANTA supposedly consulted. Upon the RCMP return from a visit in Toronto with Quantec, one of the officers was quoted as saying; "she obviously lied", in referrence to Lori. So as you can see, not only Lori lying about something with Quantec, but Quantec personel also lying about what should be a trivial thing, but it isn't, because it pertains to excluding an excuse that Lori may have in regards of incompetence of the geologists on the Tesoro. As you can see, lies always lead to more lies and after awhile there becomes SO MANY lies, that they cannot be covered up.
Another geo that STEVE/SANTA supposedly consulted was Paul Gray, SLI's geologist at one point. This Paul wrote the huge 43-101 technical report of 2010, which incorporated all or most of the historic data for the property. His sampling during that time CONFIRMED historic data. Paul told me in a phone call, (that may be recorded), "don't worry Rick, the gold is there...". This same Paul then did a 180 degree turn shortly BEFORE the drill results came out, literally contradicting himself and the historic data, this blatantly shows a inconsistency with Pauls presentation. Where STEVE/SANTA uses Paul as testimony to his collective geological contact, Pauls opinion should not be considered because of the above inconsistency and more. To further, many geo,s, do NOT KNOW how to interpret geophysics, but, a child could interpret OUR geophysics, so no excuse lies there. As for any attack on my credibility in relation to geology and sciences thereof, my presentations are sound and CONSISTENT.
We have a huge bonanza to be mined at surface, let alone the HUGE DEPOSITS revealed by the geophysics. So again, you can ignore the geophysics and mine what we KNOW, the very rich veins at the surface. These KNOWN veins at the surface are comparible and EXCEED those of the richest gold mines in the world. One indication of this may be the 4 tons of A-4 material that averaged a whopping 11 ounces per ton! This sample has a value of around |$50,000 and could easily fit in 4- 45 gallon gas drums. The vein revealed to the visitors of the Tesoro perhaps two years ago, that averages 3 ounces per ton with a width of about 1 meter, is at SURFACE, could be easliy exploited for a length of 15 meters, 18 inches deep, to extract perhaps the same amount of gold. AND, IMPORTANTLY, this vein is HIGHLY mineralised with most likely economical copper and silver, which would pay for the gold processing. The above is important when determining and doing a pre, or a feasibilty study upon the Tesoro. But I grant you, that a feasibility study is NOT required for the Tesoro to determine its economical factors, for common sense alone, KNOWS that it IS economical.
The last report done on the property which supposedly says it is NOT economical, is a complete FARCE. Such a report IS LEGALLY supposed to be presented to the shareholders, of which it HAS NOT. To further, ANY report was definitely NOT REQUIRED at that time in any legitimate theme, and perhaps was only intentionally executed by Lori to releive swiftly, the company from remaining funds it had. Robert would have been PAID for that report out of SLI Company FUNDS, and I am curious as to how much showed up on the books, for payment of such a ridiculous report.