You know Molson, even though you are hypothetically speaking, your comment makes most sense.

I trust and respect John Brophy's work for SLI. It was/is always consistent. I turned his work inside out, scrutinizing every aspect and detail to its fullest, NEVER finding any inconsistencies. John Brophy's work on the Tesoro, including reports and signing off on news releases match the Tesoro as being highly potential , with many aspects supporting that potential, put into fact and disclosed.

As for the Paul Gray technical report of 2010, it says little and gives nothing new to build on from, rather than CONFIRMING some high grade sampled areas and maintaining the high potential. The most important part of the 2010 technical report, is the Quantec geophysics complement, it is within this Quantec information, that all is revealed and the potential incredibly enhanced to amazing proportions. Once that Quantec was done and shared publicly, there is NO denying of what lies beneath, plain and simple, and it is huge.

To further with my trust in John Brophy, you have drill releases showing little to nothing, you have a Robert Krause report that severley discredits the property and Johns historic work, then, MORE IMPORTANTLY, you have a recent visit to the property showing an amazing gold bearing vein at surface grading 3.5 ounces of gold and a width at surface of almost 1 meter! It becomes very clear from just that ONE bit of information, that the whole DOWNPLAY of the property is INTENTIONAL. If Robert Krause was legit and had an ounce of integrity, he could have released a report showing the numerous veins sampled at SURFACE and how RICH the Tesoro actually is. A child would know that a 3.5 ounce per ton gold vein at surface is extremely rich, a child could look at the geophysics and see what the colors mean, yet, you have authority and everyone connected to Lori, saying NO. It is totally absurd but also very obvious of the COVERUP.

As a very high up investing firm, with several professional geologists employed that know the property's data, said to me; " it is more than one mine on this property, it is several" and " the first set of drill results is a TOTAL disconnect from all historic data of the property". So as you can see, professionals saying the same thing as us.