Beyondhelp, I have no fear of you, whoever you may be. What you may be misconstruing as fear, is nothing more than an exposing of your subliminal attempts at making fun of shareholders here. It is very clear that everytime I and other shareholders post perhaps a significant avenue at securing future justice, you and Santa show up on this hub. It is very obvious that your intent to show up in these conspicuous times, is nothing more than desperation. A desperation which shows your true colors. To come on this hub and make fun of shareholders that are making a stand for truth, suggests that your intent is to distort this stand anyway you can. This reveals the fear you have and your ulterior motive. It could also be considered as, "kick them while they are down". Now what kind of a person is that, that takes advantage of another in such a pathetic way? Do you not see how obvious you are?

Your recent slur of the Kanata movement and what it represents, is just another revelation of your intent, as well as Santa's. You decided to attack the avenue by ridiculing the Kanata movement itself and ignoring the purpose of the movement and how certain aspects of such a movement could be employed here to assist investors. Your intent is always the same, to attempt to block any avenues investors may have towards justice, by ridicule, as to spread doubt. The Kanata movement may have valuable instruments that investors could adopt to assist in receiving justice. To close ones mind to some of these instruments, is to disempower by removing options. It is the information from the Kanata movement and others, that may have value for investors here in acheiving justice. What choices do we investors really have, when it is blatant that the justice system of Canada is corrupt, in the sense, but not limited to, that 91% of the shareholders votes was not recognized by a judge? It becomes very important that if we investors are to be successful in obtaining justice, which will assist many others that were pillaged, that we must think and go outside of the box for answers and possible tools to achieve the means to the end.

Yours and others preconceived notion that I did all the banning, leaves you in a mistaken position which questions your knowledge and intent, once again. To imply I am responsible for all the banning, when that is not so, is speculation on your part, and is clearly an attempt at further degrading me publicly. To set the record straight, yes I did ban a few in the begining, BUT, after I saw the value of what intentional bashers brought to the hub, I refrained from banning to the most degree, and only rarely banned then when it was obvious to ALL, the intent of the basher. Our only chance at receiving justice and righteousness, is staying together, and we did and do ensure that any manipulation to divide and conquer is swiftly addressed, as per example once again in this post.

As for your domination remarks, is this really so, or are you just creating this again in a vain attempt at discrediting me? As for world domination, would you agree that it is right to rob and deceive others? So, if you have a problem with what you may consider as me dominating, I suggest you to really revisit that and look at what I stand for. Am I leader, perhaps I am, but my intentions are honorable with assistance to anyone to let them stand beside me, not behind me. We are all One, and thats where the power resides, but in attempts at getting the truth out there, I continuously stick my neck out to ensure that, and that will not change, UNTIL there is great change to the mechanisms that allowed for this pathetic impositioning upon SLI shareholders, and ALL small investors.

I should add here that Lori and her lawyers are in a legal jeopardy because of their misuse of justice. If I understand correctly from information I received from one of Lori's lawyers, her lawyers were under her command and intention, implying that Lori instructed the lawyers how to act and proceed. These statements include serious illegal intent that ALSO places accountability upon Lori, due to her instruction to the lawyers. The lawyers also breached their professional oath by acting in a manner contrary to law. And, by reading between the lines of the info I received, any future legal action against these lawyers will result in connective action against their client, LORI. So, very interesting how this may unravel in the future.

Love and Light

Rick