As the title of this post suggests, properties have been misappropriated by SLI management in clear racketeering.

The racketeering crime by management is incontestible in relation to the Cueva Blanca and certain Carmi Moly claims, and readily identified by any investigative agency, if the investigative agency is actually one of merit and integrity.

This means that the evidence obtained by an investigative officer in regards to these two property transactions, is incontestible and does not need a court decision to press charges and halt further criminal activity. For instance; if a police officer witnesses a person murdering someone, they arrest them right there, THEY DO NOT run to a court or judge to receive a warrant to arrest, the police, as well as any authoritative have the invested power to intervene and prevent further crime upon reasonable suspicion. For an investigative officer to look at the Cueva Blanca transaction, they see right away the violation under the BCBCA and areb OBLIGATED to act in the name of protecting the public interest. So that the investigative arms could NOT play ignorant and say they didn;t find nor see this, INVESTORS SENT THIS INFORMATION TO THEM, so the investigative agencies have NO excuse for initial intervention in this respect.

The information below also shows ALL in partisan to a crime, to be held accountable. Meaning, even the RCMP and BCSC employees become subject to criminal charges when they DO NOT whistle blow on their respective superiors and condone the non enforcement issues that the SLI shareholders are presently enduring and incurring. THIS IS WHY WE HAVE WON, and will see the truth revealed, the authorities CANNOT wiggle out of this, and the further this sharade of non enforcement continues, the more authoritative employees it involves and presents for future prosecution. In situations like this, where government and agencies thereof are partisan to crime, with blatant acts of SUPPRESSION AND OPPRESSION , a higher Universal Court will take presidence and must.

4.1 Prosecuting Persons Involved in Organized Crime

A number of countries have passed legislation prohibiting participation in the activities of a criminal entity or organization. Perhaps the best known of these laws is the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) statute in the US. Enacted in 1970, RICO defines racketeering very broadly, including murder, kidnapping, gambling, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion, drug dealing, and a list of federal offences, such as loansharking, counterfeiting, mail and wire fraud (Abadinsky, 2003:318).

RICO has facilitated the prosecution of those involved in OC, as the use of traditional conspiracy statutes has proven difficult. Rather than having to prove a series of distinct conspiracies, under RICO it is a crime to belong to an enterprise that is involved in a "pattern of racketeering", even if that pattern was displayed by other members. A "pattern" refers to just two or more of the specified offences within a ten-year period. The violation of RICO’s criminal provisions may result in imprisonment for 20 years and/or a fine of up to $25,000 (Abadinsky, 2003:319).

RICO also contains provisions according to which citizens can sue for damages to their business or property. They stand to recover threefold the damages sustained, as well as the cost of the suit. RICO also has asset forfeiture provisions, as well as those pertaining to the divestiture of the interests of OC figures in businesses and unions. These issues are discussed in the sections on the Seizure and Forfeiture of Assets and Injunctions, Divestitures, and Trusteeships.

http://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/csj-sjc/jsp-sjp/rr05_5/p5.html