I have finally had the opportunity to view this video of Lori,s promotional effort.

On the positive side, I see how this technology could enhance our awarness efforts regarding our story. This technology could be accessed to conveniently place our story within certain subject lines and expand awareness to a roader audience. For example; my attempts in the past of putting out the truth on Twitter, has my tweets being buried among the traffic and had no direction to sources that would take notice and interest, more so than the public. With this tech, I/we could put out a more directed awareness with our content arriving at target choices, if required in the future. I say if required, because as far as I am concerned, the authorities are boxed in and must take definitive action in our favour very shortly, hence relinquishing perhaps future awareness by us.

On another note, this video is a clear depiction of the stock market games and how they really work. One must first look outside the box and understand the underlying intent when any Executive of a company promotes. The main objective of all listed companies on any Exchange, is to secure Executive compensation, as well as their employees. The "luring" aspect of any promotion is actually illegal as suported by applicable law of this country. It is not enough in a Civil court of law to merely say as a defence, "I didn,t know". Meaning; the presentations made that entice investors are very subject to law. As many of you recall during investigation, you were asked; "why did you buy the stock?". The answer to this was widely given, "because of the news releases and other promotional content, mainly by Lori." But, to also greatly complement your reply, should have been the geologist consultations that many of you had regarding mainly the Tesoro. This testimony, is actually concrete and immediately identifies the crime in question. It does not take an authority months and years to see this, but merely days if the intent to resolve in a timely manner is instilled within a mandate. Legally, this is where "negligence" enters the picture by placing the public in face of further harm.This is why we have won and the decision remains with the authorities to make amends and rectify the jeopardy they have placed upon investors, and in general, the dangers they allowed to exist to further harm a public.

None of the above may matter though, as the financial system crumbles because of the blatant fraud that it has operated under.

Love,

Rick