Welcome To the WIN!!! St. Elias Mines HUB On AGORACOM

Keep in mind, the opinions on this site are for the most part speculation and are not necessarily the opinions of the company WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Free
Message: Barrick's Shareholders

What I see in this decision by the judge to allow the lawsuit against Barrick to go ahead, is the court throwing a bone to the plaintiffs in the form of "circumstantial evidence" as depicted below in this excerpt;

""Though plaintiffs have not alleged a motive, they have sufficiently alleged strong circumstantial evidence of conscious misbehavior or recklessness," the judge wrote in a 55-page decision."

So above is the bone thrown for certain appeasement at this time in giving the plaintiffs a "hope". However, it becomes clear that any future judges decision will be controlled in the favour of the corporation; Barrick, because of this next excerpt, which blatantly shows the judge not utilizing the prowess of the OECD http://www.oecd.org/ ( AS YOU CAN SEE, MANY COUNTRIES ratified the OECD, INCLUDING Canada and the U.S.) and as well, a recent precident higher court ruling which allows a case basis efficient and enveloping, the plaintiffs to join between countries and take legal action against any international corporation, in this case, the TSX. Where the judge states in the excerpt below that "a key U.S. securities fraud law does not reach that far" AND SHE DISMISSED THE SERIOUS CHARGES AS A RESULT, blatantly shows the desire to restrict the plaintiffs ability of justice, and also to protect the TSX against the best interests of the public. This judges reasoning is totally contradictory to the publics interests intentionally, and ignores the remedies emplaced to seek justice without borders. Any judge of her caliper would KNOW the abilities of law and the resource remedies, for her to EXCLUDE these remedies from the proceedings, depicts intention by her because simply put, "ignorance is no defence", especially in her appointment.

We know that Barrick has bribed at least one judge in Argentina in the past with also possible intimidation towards that judge, I blatantly see Barricks footprints on this judge as well.

The excerpt below which describes her trying to restrict the plaintiffs and disuade them from taking action against the TSX which plays a large part in stock manipulation through the assigned Market Makers (MM), SHOWS THE FULL BIAS.

"She also dismissed claims related to transactions conducted on the Toronto Stock Exchange, saying a key U.S. securities fraud law does not reach that far. "

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/01/barrick-gold-lawsuit-idUSL2N0WY27F20150401

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply