That explanation is a typical excuse not to answer the question. Who is "we" ? Would that be you? Or your handlers? ..and don't tell me i'm jumping to conclusions. I came to the same conclusion as anyone who would read that post. It's called literacy and the most reasonable interpretation. It was very clearly implied Rick should take the opportunity given, to turn his back to what shareholders have been subjected to. Spare me with your excuses to get out of the implication of consequences of some form should he decide against this oh so generous offer. We are all sick and tired of walking this fine line of not quite saying something to ensure the ass is covered. Grow a pair and just say it or stfu already.