Welcome To the WIN!!! St. Elias Mines HUB On AGORACOM

Keep in mind, the opinions on this site are for the most part speculation and are not necessarily the opinions of the company WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Free
Message: primed for a dryhump


"Lets not forget that Sculpin chose gold plays like Arequipa to compare SLI with and he tried desperately to convince everyone that Tesoro was the EXACT same geology as Arequipa when the two are vastly different. Bow2u fanned that fire with calculations using the per ounce price from the historic highlight real to the Hogtown mythical ounce calculations to project absolutely idiotic values for St. Elias mines. You conveniently forget any facts the shine negative light on anyone other than Lori and Primed24. But facts are facts and all of these dolts where part of a massive con. Who was used by who is and may never be known."


Read more at http://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/v.sli.h/st-elias-mines-ltd#sHkztcflmHgrc1pX.99



Refresh my memory who it was declaring Catherine McCleod did it wrong and could have got much more..imo clearly insinuating that the intentions were to do far better with the tesoro? Also, since you want to talk about posters on AG with calculations, lets not forget Primed had some very interesting, descriptive diagrams and a calculation that put everyone elses to shame. My my, for such a dustbowl there sure seems to be a lot of 'nonshareholding', 'no gold theory' activity on these BBs. Enough so that I feel it indicates the probability of just the opposite. I also notice now Headbop here tried to convince the BB the suspension was from a lack of funds rather than a lack of directors. A lack of funds from a unique company able to self fund exploration and at the same time prove up 43101 resources. So just to be clear Id love to hear the reasoning why further exploration wasn't put on hold, and the obvious profiting from the vein material put towards paying necessary bills until such a time the company could raise more money? Seems pretty basic to me. Unless of course someone has other plans, which appears to be the case. Not sure what those plans are but it doesn't appear they have any indication of resolve while, according to Headbop, the dissidents, or shareholders as I like to call them, have the controlling interest of shares. Just my unprofessional, common man, common sense opinion of course. What do I know right? I'm not here to put words in anyones words. Just sharing thoughts.

Share
New Message
Please login to post a reply