Certainly there must be some merit to these alternative news sources that are continuously sharing unthinkable things with the public? For if there was no merit, these sources would easily be taken to courts to answer to their allegations. Where you see no to very little court cases against these news sources, because applicable lible laws do offer the avenue for legal proceedings, then one has to think that these alternative news sources CANNOT be prosecuted, because they are in receipt of evidence that secures their integrity. Simply put, no government or official would take this to court, if they KNEW the evidence was stacked against them. So what they attempt to do, is to discredit the sources to prevent the public from believing the source. Much the same as our SLI battle.

Seeing is believing, and when a government or any ruling body for that matter, are able to distort what you are seeing, are able to distort your perception, then they are able to control you and carry on with the illusions they have created, to serve themselves.

Some may argue that these alternative news sites are satire. This is misconstrued for its real function as a lable. To quickly look at privicy statements and disclaimers of governmental sites, you may quickly find that the disclaimers may be represented as satirical as well. This form of illusion is very present in TSX Policy, where even though there are rules to follow, contradictory disclaimers suggest that the rules may not be enforceable. When one examines aspects like this, they easily arrive at the conclusion and are able to see. Seeing is believing...

Here is something suggesting an RCMP official being involved in a coup to interfere with another countries government. When you have ex government officials speaking out, does this not offer an air of merit in any case? Just ask yourself why would any official jeopardize fully their future and possible life, if there was no merit to what they publicly share? Haven't you seen how the "Swiss Leaks" and "Luxembourg Leaks" that show government involment in tax schemes to say the least, have sparked official investigations into politicians and governments? If these allegations were not true,the would be easily denounced and no investigation would be warranted. Plain and simple.

"Britain and Canada were co-conspirators in the latest plot to topple Venezuela’s government."

"Venezuelan authorities identified US embassy personnel involved. So were a Royal Canadian Mounted Police official and UK diplomatic core member, according to National Assembly President Diosdado Cabello."

http://www.globalresearch.ca/britain-and-canada-involved-in-foiled-us-venezuelan-coup-plot/5431523