If you read the post in its entirety and check out the link, you will find that you mistaken and have jumped to conclusions based on assumption. You approached this subject with a preconceived notion and now will find your enterpretation is invalid. I did not write that post, it was script from the link. To further , by acting on preconceived notions, you set yourself up to missing a lot of information and misunderstanding.

I do believe it is very easy to interpret the bill without legal advice, and to grasp the actual capabilities of the bill, if it becomes law. When you have professionals like many investigative journalists interpreting this bill for you, do you still think their opinion is wrong too?

As for Bannedbillyboy, he had the invitation perhaps 2 years ago to come back here posting and said then, that I would not ban him, unless shareholders reported enough violations on him. As you must have also missied, or misinterpreted, hubleaders usually ban after they receive enough complaints from the shareholder voice, a democratic process.