Joves post is below starting with the bolding, my reply is as follows;
Jove, if u take the time to read the news release in depth and in a perceptive manner, you will find that cleverly, the news releases were designed as to fill in gaps later, which could/can be astronomical yet today. Your widths being less than a meter is a misconception when it states in the releases that these were more or less just sampled intervals and didn,t acyually mean that the true widths of the vein/quarts was represented. Further, with this impressive Tesoro, it is a FACT that quartz veins were NOT the only source of mineralization, but actually several methods of mineralization are observed on the property, most notably sulfide intrusions of the host rock. If you recall, she said silicious zones were not tested from the drill core as well. I could write pages on a reply to you, but I believe this will suffice.
RE:RE:Seeking the Truth
And just a further tease, regarding both those NRs, the 10th, and the 23rd. Sculpin, what do you make of all that data regarding gold, and the intervals? Not ONE interval was greater than a meter! LESS than a meter! ALL of them. Talk about trying to put a shine on an impotent property!
Read more at http://www.stockhouse.com/companies/bullboard/v.sli/st-elias-mines-ltd#PFhYD2kMt4W8eBE4.99
