It is one thing not to get a news release on an aquired property, but what about not getting a news release about losing a property?

Isn't there some sort of protection to shareholders that invest in a company solely because they like certain assets, only to find out months down the road that the company doesn't even own the property anymore?

How can this not be illegal? What if I invested in SLI because I really liked the Carmi property? What if I kept buying shares because of this property? I just don't understand how we could lose such an asset, and not be notified via a news release from management.

For you investors that liked the Carmi property, Dorian Leslie, the new owner (you remember him....the property accidently lapsed right into his hands) did a geophysical report on it last summer. I thought I would post it for anyone that is interested:

GEOPHYSICAL REPORT

ON THE

CARMI PROJECT

GREENWOOD MINING DIVISION

BRITISH COLUMBIA

NTS 082E 11

UTM Zone 11, NAD 83

342300E 5486800N

Prepared for:

Dorian Leslie

#1108 – 1111 Alberni Street,

Vancouver, British Columbia, V6E 4V2

BY

James Thom, M.Sc.

http://aris.empr.gov.bc.ca/ArisReports/34139.PDF