You are welcome AA.

It appears that Lori and company carry a high degree of immunity and protection, thus the non action by all authorities. This very thing alone only enhances how big this must be.

It is not enough at this time to even consider a legal battle, even though much of the evidence is seemingly incontestable, whereas our past experience with the judicial aspects, has shareholders shaking their heads in disbelief at the couple outcomes. This is important information for the shareholders, that the judicial system, as it stood at those times, is also dysfunctional and is not democratically based. For Justice Steves to be quoted as saying by one journalistic source; "there was no other remedy", leaves many questions on the professionalism of this statement, if correct. For one simple thing, there were many remedies and also the construct of arbitration could have easily been engaged.

I know in the past, most people believed they were living in a "real world", where rights were upheld and the law was the law, designed to protect the best interests with a democratic viewpoint. Since then, most here now, if not all, see the real world, and how the laws and prosecutors seem to be biased in favor of the money and corporational aspects. This depiction is the tell tale signs that something is terribly wrong with our judicial system, one system of many that shareholders have witnessed as disfunctional from the protection perspective that is publicly conveyed.

In answer to this question; " So do you believe a strong group of shareholders or do you believe that the authorities on all levels have done their jobs and have found nothing wrong?"; I believe these shareholders are tremendously strong, perhaps the strongest yet to ever stand against such control and expose so much. I do not believe that the authorities have executed professionalism on any part. Furthermore, if they had, transparency was a pertinent key here between investigative authorities and shareholders, which the typical response from authorities is; "we cannot comment on an ongoing investigation". To make that statement, is totally unacceptable and absurd, mostly because there is no display by the authorities, to mitigate risk. Time is always a critical factor when investors are involved, and to not put investors out of harms way by enforcing blatant laws that investors themselves reported, suggests negligence on ALL authoritative parties.

Further, the authorities are definitely not professional nor competent, if they didn,t find anything wrong. For the RCMP to say they could not prove intent, is ludicrous. To merely prove intent, the court can use circumstantial evidence alone in this case to prove dishonesty, then dishonesty proves intent/motive. I believe this also speaks to a degree, of the RCMP,s mistrust of the judicial system, funny eh?

We are in very transitional times, compounded by many other contributory aspects, nothing is impossible, and we are at a time that history DOES NOT REPEAT, if everyone here understands this and stands their ground. Even though at face value, it may look as though nothing will happen, an alternative perspective should be considered; how can this continue as it has without anything being done? The shareholders did not want it all, their intentions were to share, with so many shareholders around the Quantec revelations, expressing how they would help the unfortunate, if they became rich. I know this to hold true for many, if not all, yet today.

These are my beliefs.

Thank You

Rick