Whereas no authority has acted in protecting the investors of SLI, it simply tells you that Management didn,t lie and that everything can be explained and justified for all involved and that this is indeed one of the biggest mineral finds ever, if not the biggest.

If we look at the Mining Stock Report (MSR), THIS SUGGESTS A MININUM OF A BILLION OUNCES OF GOLD. Where the Tesoro is that rich or richer, the economics would suggest that a figure of $500 per ounce gold in the ground, would be a reasonable price to pay for the Tesoro. Using Conservative figures and quick math, this would roughly equate to $500,000,000,000 being a reasonable buyout price, converting that into price per share, it is around $4200 PER SHARE.

So, this $4200 per share is what we are owed, at least.

Who owes us this?

Well usually the buyer owes the owners, but in this case, we do not know who the buyer is, but we do know that Governments, (Canadian and U.S.) and ALL authorities do know who the buyers are, for the above agencies have to know this to validate saving them from a serious position of neglect under law which puts them into a neglatory position of $500,000,000,000 mininum, and hooking ALL TAX PAYERS FOR THIS BILL SHOULD THEY NOT BE ABLE TO EXPLAIN NEGLECT.

DO WE HAVE TO PROVE THE GOLD IS THERE? NO WE DONT, THE AUTHORITIES HAVE ALREADY CONFIRMED THAT FOR US BY TAKING NO ACTION AGAINST MANAGEMENT AND PRESENTING ALL SHAREHOLDERS WITH THE PROOF THAT ALL HISTORIC EVIDENCE AND DATA IS NOT MISLEADING AND IS TRUTH. FURTHERMORE, THESE SAME AUTHORITIES ARE TELLING US THAT THE DRILL RESULTS ARE TRUTH AS WELL, THE MINUTE SECTIONS OF THEM REPORTED THAT IS, THEY JUST HAVENT SHOWED US ALL THE RESULTS, AND THIS IS ONLY ALLOWED IF THERE IS A BUYOUT/DEAL IN THE WORKS.

So either ALL TAX PAYERS OF CANADA foot a much larger bill of perhaps a trillion dollars or so, or the real buyers must step forward and pay the shareholders.

The RCMP have told us that they are comfortable that management has not mislead us which is an indictable offence under the criminal code of Canada by misleading justice when this question had to have been asked during the RCMP investigation. For the RCMP to establish that there was no case against management, then they had to have established that reasonably. The same goes for misappropriation of funds which is covered under theft in the CRIMINAL CODE OF CANADA, whereas the RCMP see no evidence to move forward when a company has no revenue, yet spends between $3000-$7000 per day on travel and promotion for approx 3 years, tells anyone, that management must be able to justify those expences with proof that the funds were used in very legitimate means, in which DEAL MAKING may be the only way to justify these amounts. There is a lot more, but I will not go into it, there is more than enough here now.