Molson, thank you very much for sharing these astounding revelations once again.

Shareholders, you have seen enough by now, that if you were skeptical in the past about a conspiracy theory to cover up the truth with what the "Tesoro" IS, you as well as the public, should have little to no doubt now. You have been shown so much truth, but there is still more, that I ask of each one of you to stand your ground, stay unified and be well prepared to take this to new levels.

The importance of Molsons post, is the U.S. and their military connection. You have the U.S. government in on this as well as our Canadian Government, and possibly a couple other worldly influences, most likely with an attachment to the BRIC countries. I also suspect the IMF had, or still do, some increadible knowledge of whats happening here, but on a global scale, the IMF is no comparison to some of the SWF,s (soveriegn wealth funds) in which are monetary instruments of governments, as previously discussed. I will further the military connection importance, with what the injunction against me essentially says, that I am supposed to not be publicly talking about any governments involved with the SLI thing, very interesting, hey? Why would any justice risk his career in granting such an injunction to SLI management, mainly the 2 representative SLI lawyers in this case, by denying me due process, which defies all law? A very desperate move comprised of a rush factor to silence me, which yet again, jeopardizes the written law?

The RCMP have told you, shareholders; that intent could not be proven. I , and others, fully disagree with this statement by the RCMP, whereas the excruciating evidence weighed most favourably on the "incontestable" side of the scales in a court of law. This blatant evidence delivered to the authorities didn,t even need to go to a court to determine wrong doing, the laws are written as such, that a conviction/charge could be readily attained without a relative burden of proof. It is my understanding of the B.C. judicial system as well as the IMET division, that crown prosecuters reveiw the evidence prior to a decision to proceed with charges, I was told that these very consults, the crown prosecuters, which are governmental employees, decided not to move forward. So again, the judicial system is playing games and helped stall other available alternatives for investors during the ~17 month investigation and have placed us in an even more harmful position as a result.

For Lori to make such statements, as per Molsons post, most definitely " and he is offering his help when we need it.... and the U.S...ahh...basically the U.S. Army", this leaves the investors believing that the Tesoro IS huge and that the U.S. Government IS involved. So to look at the legal aspects of this statement of many made by Lori, and if it is truth or not, one can easily establish if there is misleading statements that lead to motivation and eventually to intent. So if we entertain that the above quote is untrue, it is deciet that sets the stage handsomely for proving fraud in a court of law because motivation and intent falls in place as dishonesty is proven. If we entertain that the above quote is TRUE, then that means that Lori IS telling the truth and they cannot place charges if there is no wrong doing. So if Lori is telling the truth, then that leaves us back in this circle that Governments are involved and for them to be involved, the Tesoro IS HUGE. And, as we know, SLI management is granted every level of immunity from the written law for some reason, jeopardizing not only integrity of the markets, but as well as enforment and judicial aspects, leaving a very clear picture for investors to understand that there is a conspiracy going on here.

So, the above quotes and the ones in Molsons post, are true, Lori didn,t lie. And Molson proposes the question "why would we need protection or help from the U.S. Army?". Thats a very good question, apparently the RCMP are more or less saying that Lori has not lied, so then, there MUST be something of considerable value that may require protection from the U.S. Army.