Folks, this is getting very interesting for me and I believe it may become more interesting for you as well.

In my previous post about the Birch Mountain (BM) suit, I have now found this interesting tid bit about possible RBC involvement in what happened with BM.

{What does this:

Delaware court rules RBC Capital Markets misled investors by Tim Kiladze, Globe and Mail

have to do with us?

In our Statement of Claim we make mention of the role of RBC. Three significant events involving RBC, in the course of advising Birch Mountain, raise serious questions.

1. Why did RBC, Birch's paid financial advisor, downgrade Birch Mountain at the same time Davenport Securities recommended BMD as a STRONG BUY?

2.. RBC, Birch's paid financial advisor, was leading the "exploration of strategic alternatives to enhance shareholder value, joint venture, merger, sale of the company." RBC, similar to the situation in the article cited above, was responsible for shopping Birch around.

3. RBC, advises Birch to reject a bought deal that would have provided enough capital to work through the year and into profitablity and instead to accept the death spiral toxic financing provided by Brookfield/Tricap.

See any similarities? But wait . . . there is more to the story . . .

Also in the Statement of Claim: What is the role of Jim Pattison, if any?

Ahhhh, the plot thickens.}

http://jimymac.blogs.com/shareholdersforjustice/

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To initiate possibly tying the RBC/Birch Mountain connection with the perhaps RBC connection to SLI, I think of several things, in which I will number below.

1) Bob Lachance was a salesman/agent for Dominion Securities in 1985 that is part of RBC.

2) Rumour has it that Jeff Ruskowsky at one time may have worked for RBC.

3) RBC was the main underwriter for Barrack Golds Last huge financing in which RBC seemed to take a very solid part of the offered shares upon themselves and risking not being able to sell the Barrick shares to the public, carrying perhaps a forward risk.

4) I believe investors here have encountered problems with RBC in getting proxy control numbers in the past and recently, one investor has stated that RBC would vote the shares for that investor and would not allow the investor to vote himself. (the investors that this item may involve, please feel free to share your RBC experiences with others in regards to your SLI stock, thank you)

5) It was RBC many times in this stock, (SLI) , that appeared to be stepping down the share price and greatly affecting the share price.

6) When my RBC accounts were compromised in Jan 2012, at the same time the stock was getting hit by immense pressure, stock started to go missing in my accounts. I proceded to shut down all my RBC trading accounts shortly after with very peciliar circumstances that would/did have had me going to several RBC branches to get my accounts frozen, which resulted in not getting them frozen. (There is a lot more about this circumstance that I may not share at this time because of some possible future litigation)

Does anyone else have anything to add that may show RBC being a common denominator in perhaps questionable acts?

thank you

Rick