In all reality, and within a justice system that is supposedly designed to protect Citizens, the Citizens are not protected. The justice system is but an illusion that denies the right of the individual and also creates an ignus faatus around our Constitution. The justice system is flawed and biased to an extent that enables the rich and powerful to manipulate it to their benefit and contradict its design.

In the confines of regulators, they are well equipped to enforce laws, from a well founded legal position that is clear on instruct. To not enforce such concise and distinct constructs of law, has every evidence of being an illegal act that infringes upon the soveriegn rights of an individual.

It is no excuse for management not to reveal the "azimuth and dip" of the drill holes to the shareholders and public. It is managements responsibility to know the laws, thats why they are entrusted by the shareholders, to efficiently and legally run the corporate aspects of the company for themselves and in the best interests of the shareholders. It is very evident from numerous past releases on several other properties, that the law was known and that these 43-101 requirements, the "azimuth and dips", were released as per law. It is no defence as to play ignorant to securities law that is a requisite of the managerial status. Having said this, intent of fraud does not have to be proven, or if it may have to be proven, an incontestible case could perhaps be easily constructed from just the simplicity of the above.

Partially because of the above, my damages accumulate daily as with every other shareholder here because we are denied the full presentation of fact in which we are entitled and it has kept us in a position where we are unable to fully determine if the targets have been drilled or not, whereas the angles of the holes add the clarity needed to make a reasonable investing decision. It is not enough for management to just say they did.

So, hopefully the Securities will act very shortly, however the "mitigation of risk" with Securities and management, appears to be non existent up to this point and may have placed them both in very awkward situations, that under common law, they may not escape.