Sovereign Wealth Funds are basically huge monies under the administration of Governments. There is at least one in Canada, The Alberta Heritage Fund, http://www.finance.alberta.ca/business/ahstf/ which is administered mainly by the Minister of Finance and his department for Alberta, Doug Horner. There are several in the U.S. with notable mention of two such funds in Texas, as well as around the globe, as per this information link. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_sovereign_wealth_funds.

When we actually look to see and understand exactly who SWF Investments is, it is basically a non profit resource data base that has been established by the SWF,S themselves. So, any and all Governments around the world developed this data base; which Government, or Governments decided they wanted all information gathered on St Elias Mines (SLI) entered into an Aquisition data base? And, which one/s held/hold shares into SLI?

It is a grave concern for me and should be as well for any citizen of any country whose Government has a sovereign wealth fund. And here is why.

What kind of Government and politician would support comments such as these below on the SWF Investment site, a site of theirs?

1) The Acquisition Manual on a target company is arranged as separate volumes so that each management function within the predator company can acquire the precise information necessary for the formulation of forward strategic plans and attack campaign tactics.

2) REPORT ON COMPETITOR OPPOSITION, INTERDICTION + CONTROL is published for only one reason - to allow a reader to completely understand a specific target company and thereby enable one to tactically and strategically oppose, interdict and control that Competitor.

3) is usually better to control the competitor.

4) restrict their ability to develop products or markets;

5)To manoeuvre the competitor in respect of the costs, margins and pricing of their own products so that in effect the competitor becomes an ancillary operation (of one's own company) which is allowed to keep certain low profit or low volume customer sectors or markets. Thus one can cream off the most profitable markets and leave the less profitable ones to the competitor.

6) Confidentiality
Because the corporate reports and databases provided by The Data Institute are often precursors to a take-over of a competitor or other corporate or competitive actions, we now provide a completely confidential servicevia a firm of commercial lawyers. The client purchases will be anonomous and will be protected by legal privilege,and thus the client remains absolutely confidential and safe from any regulatory jurisdictions. To access this service please send us an email at:
confidential@acquisitionreport.com and we will arrange for you to be contacted by the commercial law firm concerned.

As you can see above, many questionable suggested actions that may be taken by these SWF,S in their chase for a target company.