As per my geophysical post the other night:

(c) If polarization is induced at all, it is induced upon an electrically conducting

mineral which is either disseminated or in a solid ore body.

So, how Gone Fishing is interpreting the statements in his post is incorrect and perhaps are manipulative to the more conclusive facts. The conclusive fact of all of this, which is so simple, even for an eight grader, is as per (c) above. Because of words "most likely" and "if" being picked out of the Miningstock authors content, and perhaps the assumption that there is uncertainty involved, this certainly does not support any justification for selling stock, whereas the facts over ride any uncertainty to what is causing the anomaly signature. To say it simply, you cannot have chargeability anomalies in that area showing up, without mineralization.

The high resitivity that accompanies the anomaly, and smaller ones, is very important in analysing the mineral content of the anomaly. By looking at slide 5750 of the geophysical report in the 2010 technical report, and pasting the C-1 adit of 100 meter depth to scale, upon that slide, it confirms the derivatives of the geophysical signature of the anomaly, plain and simple. A massive sulphide sample was taken just above an area in the C-1 adit, that has a corresponding and distinctive signature of high resitivity, almost as high as the resitivity in the giant anomaly. For the resitivity to be this very high in the anomaly, there has to be higher grades of silver and perhaps a measurable PGM component, plain and simple. You cannot have massive sulphides, drill them and have nothing, where an established gold content/ratio is present, in a mesothermal/epithermal system, plain and simple.

Coincidently, the news release mentioned in the link below of an older post of mine, has been broken,lol. Take a peek.

http://agoracom.com/ir/steliasmines/forums/discussion/topics/564635-massive-sulphides

By analysing the data, there is either one of 2 things going on with SLI, either this is a massive coverup to whats really in the ground, or this is a total scam with Quantec and others involved. I would tend to go with the former, whereas there is much local geological data to support and evidence the historical and rich data that has come from the general area containing the Tesoro property.

I will annex perhaps another connected aspect of whats going on by reverting back to the last PP of 2011. The timing is conspicuous for one thing, and the deliberate manipulation of the stock price from ~$2.30 to $~2, to allow the PP to be done around ~$1.80. The PP could have been done before drilling started, why do it during, and perhaps a month or two, after drilling has commenced? Also, trenching had started 3 months prior to the PP, and we see the rate of trenching, with ~km,s done in the first couple of weeks, that could easily have revealed numerous veins with visible gold. Any CEO would want to know results from any exciting property such as this, as soon as they materialized. With the Tesoro, the Quantec suggests many mineralized structures possibly containing gold, at and near the surface in the area first trenched. There had to be gold bearing veins found there, and a NR should have been executed reporting such. If nothing was being found, why did the trenching continue for km,s? The Quantec is that accurate, as displayed several times in historic data, that one trench across a signature would expose what is setting it off, but it is already known what is setting it off, sulphides.

Its beyond time to tell the investors the truth, and there is no way out of this for the perpetrators, the evidence simply will not allow it. It doesn,t matter if this is a scam or not, it has gone on too long, that so many investigative parties can be held accountable as well. One consultation with a professional geo, that may have taken a month at least, would easily have revealed the inconsistencies. The authorities were alerted to do as such a long time ago, non action on their parts, have left them open for prosecution of a different manner.

IMO