Don't ever recall anyone calling these pictures pretty, especially as any sort of supported DD

The pretty pictures from the Quantec surveys are not a guarantee of metals in the ground.

Pretty? Perhaps impressive? Perhaps, sulphides? Perhaps listen to the 2011 AGM audio!

What I do recall however, as I was at the 2010 & 2011 AGM, and, I have listened to the 2011 audio several times, both the Q&A, & the presentation, is what I posted the other day.

Listen to the audio everyone, then we can discuss further.

Words very similair to the following:

• Has to be 3-4% sulphides to generate readings like that, and we've seen alot of stuff ...
• We know from previous work that gold is associated with sulphides ...
• An avg of 1OZ/T is 1-2% sulphides, and we know this system is mineralized, and there is 3-4% sulphides ...
• Every single step we have taken on this is unreal ...
• The results that are about to be shown ...

More, more, and many more comments can be heard, if & only if, you choose to listen

So much more, but, as I've always said, everyone needs to listen to the audio. As they listen, remember, this was Nov 2011, and yet Oct 2011 (or earlier, obviously), is when things really seemed to change?