LOL, great find Mols!!

BOW usually does the math, but that adds up to an average hole length of 650 m. When you divide the 13,000 by 43 holes that our news releases say, it equals ~ 300m as the average hole. I believe it was said by Lori, but don,t quote me on this, that the heart of the giant anomaly was positioned approx at the 600m level. It also seems to suggest, that the giant anomaly would not be penetrated until around 277m onward, if I remember correctly, and continuing to ~1300m depth, with the heart being positioned around the 600m level. But, where this is mostly a mesothermal system, the deep MT that was done and not released, may show that it continues onto depth, whereas the dipole positioning would allow a clearer deeper image, helping to reduce any masking factor by the shallower intense chargeability.

Now this geo appears to be very professional, attaching an insignia of Senior Geologist.I don,t readily see a professional geo making a mistake in his professional profile, but perhaps he has? I have to put this find Mols, into the box with the other seemingly contradictions or inconsistencies. No wonder we are called conspiracy theorists, its because we constantly find things that don,t add up or are not consistent,lol.

I believe someone should contact Ademir and get an explanation or correction on this info he has in his profile. We do not perhaps wish to continue to speculate, or perhaps SLI can answer this question?

I will take this opportunity to revert back to a post of mine about hole #8 posted on Feb 26/2013.

http://agoracom.com/ir/steliasmines/forums/discussion/topics/565637-hole-8-most-likely-huge/messages/1779396

Then take a look at this news release dated April 17/2013, almost 2 months after my post,

NEWS RELEASE

St. Elias Mines Ltd. – Correction re Depth of Drill Hole at Tesoro Gold Project, Peru

Vancouver, B.C. April 17, 2013, St. Elias Mines (SLI – TSX:V) (“St. Elias” or the “Company”) announces that it has come to the Company’s attention that there was an error with respect to the depth of one of the drill holes at the Tesoro Gold Project in Peru as reported in the Company’s news releases dated January 10, 2012 and January 23, 2012. It was announced that DDH-TE-08 was drilled to a depth of 330.0 metres when it was actually drilled to a depth of 233.0 metres. This drill hole was one of 43 drill holes of a drill program in excess of 12,000 metres. This error was essentially a data entry error and has no impact on the overall results of the drilling program, nor does it prejudice any conclusions that might be drawn from those results.

http://steliasmines.com/?p=1970

And to add, hole #7 was drilled to 380m, with the last sample containing gold shown at 213 m. In this area, it is quite possible for a hole drilled in the easterly direction to miss the mineralization all together, but then that would suggest unprofessionalism by the geo,s, because the geophysics clearly shows a barren hole in that area in terms of chargeability, imo at best. And also, Brophy,s tech report aronud 2005-2008 clearly shows the rake of the C-1 vein, which suggests when you get close to that barren hole, that the C-1 vein narrows and gold grade drops right off, suggesting that there is nothing in the immediate west of the C-1, However, you dont have to go west very far, 100m or so, then you are into another mineralized system with a higher chargeability signature than the C-1, suggesting possibly higher gold grades, whereas the sulphide signature increases and we already know the established correlation of gold/sulphides.

IMO

http://steliasmines.com/?p=1284