Not ignoring anyone, just had a busy night!

sliforever, yes I will say, for that post I will stand accountable. Lets face it, it the tide was turned, I'm sure we'd be saying the same thing.

Good post, good reminder of the past, and yes, what can I say, I was wrong!

I do still believe, but yes I was wrong on that time frame. No doubt. Will I be wrong for good, not sure?

When I made those comments on June 03, 2012, I was using the following as part of my justification, to help support my comments:

1. The March 25, 2012 Calgary meeting, so many things in the audio that kept so many of us positive. But, especially for me, the Carmi deal in the works. I honestly thought from hearing that, that we'd somehow see some kind of share price reward, IMO. Really, who would have thought the property would go to Dorian & James? Nobody I know!
2. The April 16, 2012 Chance E exploration, I also saw as a positive for both SLI & IGD, IMO.
3. The April 26, 2012 Lloyd Brewer focusing his efforts on the properties seemed like a big positive as well, IMO.
4. April 30, 2012 Cueva Blanca drilling to commence, waiting on paperwork, seemed like a positive, and I assumed things were progressing on all the properties, IMO
5. Capital 88 optioning Chance F, also seemed like a positive, IMO
6. Many, many comments kept me so positive, to make the post I did. I attended the 2010 & 2011 AGM, which to me was a very positive outlook for shareholders, IMO, anyway. And, so much more! Meeting all the Management, as well some others that seemed to appear later.
7. I attended the Edmonton, Petroleum Club meeting on April 18, 2010. There are words from that meeting, that really stick in my mind. In a real positive way! Not just mine, but others I was with as well.
8. So many more things, like the C3 vein bulk samples, NR on April 08, 2010, but yet when asked at the AGM, answer, IMO, very unclear?

Even, after the fact of the initial drill results, to read comments like the following, and many more, kept me very positive:

Lori McClenahan states “While it is still early days for our flagship project (the “Tesoro”), we are very excited as initial drilling at Tesoro has confirmed gold mineralization at depth. We are using logical and systematic exploration steps and techniques to guide us in our exploration efforts. Much more exploration/drilling is warranted at the Tesoro. This is just the beginning.”

But, there is so much more, and, we only drilled 60% of the original plan? How? Thought we had 9 Million in the treasury during the Calgary meeting?

But yes, I was wrong with the post I made, for the timeframe that I chose!

And, all the above points to justify my thinking, are obviously just that, IMO. Some are fact though!

But once again, yes, I was wrong

Bow