The gold is there my friend. Too many, if not all things says it is. I read an old news release last night where Lori said then, that there potentially could be 1 million ounces on the property. Then the Gluckenstein Report took it to over 2 million possible, then it looks like Lori was told by geos at one time around here that there could be 5 million ounces in just one part, then the Miningstockreport, if you do the math and really digest what he is saying, could possibly mean 100,s of millions of ounces. And in the meantime you have Dynacor on strike and to the north of us, with veins leading towards us and very close to our border/s, that have a resourse estimation over 600,000 ounces in a portion of only 3 veins, and I might add, that estimate was scaled by approx 70%, as far as I could see, before reaching the 600k ounces, suggesting a lot more gold there in actuality. Not to mention Chorunga along strike, but on the opposite side of a east west trending fault, which can in times, shift or end mineralization, still has considerable gold there , still mining and has 2 whole towns situated on veins there.

You don,t have many mills in Peru having a grade of ore around 4-5 OUNCES per ton gold, if the area isn,t rich. Not to mention that only around 10% of the Andes have been explored for some minerals and is most likely the richest mineralized subduction/mountainous area in the world for minerals. So many things and almost everything, points to not only the Tesoro of having a huge deposit, but our other two Peruvian properties have excellent chances as well of being world class, and this has been quoted by the former CEO of our company about at least one of the other properties. Also throw in here that IGD let the Cueva Blanca go, in which has a non official resource estimate of a couple hundred thousand ounces of gold and over 900 thousand ounces of silver, only to retain the Chance E, part iof the Tesoro, in which litterally no work has been done, and only around 3 little samples showed a bit of gold on the Chance E. Makes me wonder or take note of the rationale of that decision, I think I would hold onto the property that has an estimated resource instead of holding on to a property that has only a couple little surface samples taken from it. You would think that IGD is going to try to keep its most potential and valuable properties to retain value for its shareholders, especially if they need to raise money, they need something to entice investors.

I could go on and on, why there is gold on the Tesoro, but you should get the picture with this bit of info.

All IMO.