... anyone venture to guess if this statement may cause a few problems for certain people in the not too distant future? "Drill hole TE-11-06 assayed 0.74 g/t Au over 37.85 m (90.6 m to 128.5), and included 0.74 m of 23.5 g/t Au at 112.26 m and 0.35 m of 9.6 g/t Au at 113.32 m. These mineralized intersections have been interpreted to be related to widespread resistivity lows identified from the Titan 24 survey. This was the only drill hole that returned grades/interval of economically interesting results." Particularly that last sentence. Hopefully time will tell the whole story. I have a feeling that sentence might not be entirely accurate. just my opinion of course