As a matter of fact dissident these questions have NOT been answered by management. They HAVE been skated around with NO clear response. If they had been answered there wouldnt be such rampant speculation regarding them. It is clear who you represent so all I will say is this. You know Im right and you are trying to convince anyone unsure that all info has been clearly stated which all of us know for certain is not the case. Dont worry dissident. As it is clearly obvious management is NOT confident in this bs technicality actually holding any water in court, im sure when gil ted and darcy are put in place we will see EXACTLY what those cores contain and what has been kept from the shareholders at which point those accountable will most likely be held accountable. Meanwhile i will support them in every way looking forward to future information coming in a clear concise manner. You cause no doubt in my mind. i can practically recite her nr's at this point so lying to me wont cut it disdident. Please attach a link to where it states the posted results are ALL that had .5g/t or more... not all thats legally required. If thats your interpretation thats one thing however thats is NOT what has been stated. As a matter of fact what she DOES state says more results are due. What shes done is change her mind because shes lost all voting control in the company. ALL IN MY OPINION.